JSPES,
Vol. 32, No. 3 (Fall 2007)
pp. 359-376
Corruption and Democracy: Is Lord Acton
Right?
Herbert H. Werlin
Formerly University of Maryland and currently Independent Consultant
This article examines Lord Acton’s famous assertion, “power
tends to corrupt and absolute power, to corrupt absolutely,”
including the suggestion that democratization reduces corruption.
This assertion requires us to look at the meaning of three words:
power, corruption, and democracy. For this reason, the article
begins by making a distinction between primary and secondary
corruption (essentially, controllable and uncontrollable corruption)
and between liberal democracy (emphasizing competitive politics)
and classical democracy (emphasizing consensusbuilding politics).
An argument is made for a case study approach (combined with
“ordinary language” methodology) in analyzing the corruption-democracy
linkage, rather than the prevailing quantitative methodology,
particularly comparing India and China. Conventional definitions
of corruption (e.g., misuse of public resources for private
gain) and democracy (emphasizing elections and majority rule)
would indicate that China is more corrupt than India.
However, judging from a comparison of two cities (Shanghai and
Mumbai), this is clearly not the case because of the prevailing
secondary corruption in Mumbai. Political Elasticity (PE) Theory
is introduced to explain why secondary corruption is so dysfunctional
for development. Effective political power (using this theory)
takes on “rubber band” and “balloon” characteristics, facilitating
delegation of responsibility and public respect - all of which
can be undermined by uncontrollable corruption. This theory
is also used (with Russia in mind) to examine Hobbes’s position
regarding authoritarian rule. At the conclusion, the point is
made that, insofar as political power becomes entirely coercive,
it will indeed be corruptive, undermining the political software
(referring to social relationships) essential for the functioning
of institutions, as suggested by Lord Acton. If, however, political
power takes a persuasive form, it is unlikely to be so corruptive,
especially if it becomes a form of social energy.
|
|